Why Authorial Intent Doesn't Matter: The Beauty of Multiple Interpretations in Literature

Multiple Interpretations of Literature: Why Authorial Intent Doesn't Always Matter In a recent video essay by TikToker Madison McMahon (@authormmcmahon), the author explores the multifaceted nature of literary interpretation. McMahon argues that the beauty of literature lies in its ability to generate multiple, equally valid interpretations, even if those interpretations contradict the author's original intention. McMahon illustrates this point with examples from well-known novels such as Jane Eyre and Frankenstein, highlighting how different interpretations can enrich the reader's experience. "It's really hard to be wrong about a book," McMahon states in the video, "because authors' intent ultimately doesn't really matter at the end of the day." This statement underscores the video's central argument that the text itself, rather than the author's intention, becomes the primary focus of interpretation. The video has garnered significant attention on TikTok, indicating a strong interest in this topic among a broad audience. McMahon's insightful analysis provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion about the nature of literary interpretation and the enduring appeal of classic works. The video serves as a reminder that literature is not a static entity but rather a dynamic and evolving form of expression, capable of generating a multitude of meaningful readings.