Mexico Amends Judicial Reform: Opposition Cries Foul

Mexico's Judicial Reform Amended: A Controversial Move Mexico City, May 23, 2025 – The Mexican Congress recently approved a controversial amendment to the country's judicial reform. The amendment, passed by Morena and allied parties, addresses concerns about the process of selecting the president of the Supreme Court of Justice and establishes a two-year rotational presidency. Opposition parties strongly criticized the amendment, arguing it was rushed and lacked transparency. "We cannot accept these changes," stated Paulina Rubio, a deputy from the PAN party. "This is a dangerous step backward for our democracy." The amendment modifies Article 94, clarifying the selection process for the Supreme Court president, and Article 97, addressing the rotation of the presidency. The opposition's concerns center on the potential for political influence and the lack of public input in the process. The amendment passed with 27 votes in favor, while the opposition voted against it. The video shows footage of the voting session and includes interviews with deputies from both sides of the debate. The amendment's impact on Mexico's judicial system remains to be seen. However, the debate surrounding its passage highlights ongoing tensions within the Mexican political landscape.