DIGIDAY［日本版］
ブリーチャー・リポート 、NFL協業で収益50％増へ グローバル化で狙う次世代ファンとは？ | DIGIDAY［日本版］
ブリーチャー・リポート がNFL公式シーズンに初参入し、協賛収益を50％増加させる見込みだ。NFL映像や国際試合を活用し、若年層に向けたデジタルファースト報道を展開する。600人のクリエイターネットワークを使い、スポンサー形式を多様化して収益拡大を図り、放送とSNSの隙間を埋める新しいNFL体験を…
263
8k
219
93k
Browns' Quarterback Conundrum: Is Dillon Gabriel the Answer, or a "Death Wish"?
Cleveland, OH – The Cleveland Browns' offensive woes have sparked a heated debate among fans and analysts regarding the team's quarterback situation. Following a recent social media post by sports commentator Blaiden Kirk, discussions have intensified over whether rookie Dillon Gabriel should replace current starter Joe Flacco. Kirk, a prominent voice among Browns supporters, strongly advised against starting Gabriel. "It is a death wish to throw someone like Dillon Gabriel out against that [tough defenses] with the guys the Browns have," Kirk stated in his commentary, highlighting the team's challenging upcoming schedule against formidable opponents like the Packers, Vikings, Lions, and Steelers. He criticized the current offensive infrastructure, noting that "the biggest problem is the receivers are not good." Fans have echoed these concerns, with one commenter stating, "No reason to kill a possible QB of the future when you have a sacrificial one on the roster." Another remarked on the broader issues, "Changing the QB doesn’t magically make the offensive line work well and receivers not having butter fingers." However, some believe a change is necessary, with one fan asserting, "Joe Flacco is not the future and he is terrible... you need to see what the young QBs can do." The sentiment among many is that the team's struggles extend beyond a single player. As Kirk summarized, "The quarterback play is bad, the receiver play is bad... none of this is going to add up to a good offense unless you had like Patrick Mahomes or Lamar Jackson back there at quarterback." The ongoing debate underscores the critical decisions facing the Browns' coaching staff and management as they navigate a challenging season.
