Spanish Attorney General Accused of Deleting Evidence in High-Profile Case

Former Prosecutor Testifies Against Spain's Attorney General Spain is buzzing with a significant development in the Garcia Ortiz case. Salvador Viada, a former Supreme Court prosecutor, recently gave compelling testimony on Antena 3's Espejo Público, alleging that the Attorney General himself deleted evidence from his mobile phone during a court-ordered search. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the legal community and ignited public debate. "What I saw has nothing to do with the substance of the case," Viada stated, "but rather with the then-clear and later-evidenced complicity between the subject of the investigation and the prosecutor." His testimony details a pattern of behavior that raises serious questions about the integrity of the investigation. The Attorney General's actions, Viada argues, are ethically questionable and undermine the judicial process. The interview further explores the implications of using circumstantial evidence in such cases, highlighting the challenges faced by the prosecution. While the Attorney General's actions are undeniably concerning, Viada's testimony emphasizes the role of circumstantial evidence in building a case, even in the absence of direct proof. This case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in the legal system. The ongoing investigation will likely shed more light on the Attorney General's actions and their impact on the Garcia Ortiz case. The public awaits further developments with bated breath.