Should Marriages Have Expiration Dates? Social Media Debate Ignites

Should Marriage Be a Contract? A Discussion on Modern Relationships and Divorce In today's rapidly evolving society, the traditional concept of marriage is being challenged. A recent video by the social media influencer "Fashionably Divorced" has sparked a debate on whether marriages should have contract terms, similar to business agreements. The video, which has garnered over 1000 views in less than 24 hours, presents a compelling argument for considering this unconventional approach. "If marriage is a contract, why isn’t there a contract term?" asks Fashionably Divorced in her video. She argues that setting a term for marriage could potentially make divorce less acrimonious, removing the emotional element of betrayal often associated with long-term commitment breaches. She supports her claim by comparing marriage to other legally binding contracts, such as business leases and athlete contracts which have defined durations. However, the video also acknowledges the complexities of such a system. The author recognizes that humans are not property, and that a contractual approach may not fully capture the emotional nuances of a relationship. The video concludes by posing the question to viewers, inviting a broader discussion on the topic. The debate is further fueled by the increasing number of divorces and the changing expectations within modern relationships. While the idea of a contract term for marriage remains controversial, it highlights the need for open conversation and re-evaluation of traditional marriage norms. The video serves as a catalyst for this important discussion, encouraging individuals to consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of a more structured approach to marriage.