Supreme Court Hands Sensitive Data to Trump and Doge: Jackson's Dissent Sparks Outrage

The Supreme Court's decision to grant Trump and Doge access to the sensitive data of millions of Americans has sparked outrage and controversy. In a 6-3 ruling, the court overturned a lower court order that blocked access. Justice Katanji Brown Jackson, in her dissenting opinion, described the ruling as a "fishing expedition", highlighting concerns about the government's access to personal, non-anonymized information. The decision comes amid a public feud between President Trump and Elon Musk, adding another layer of complexity to the situation. The implications of this ruling are far-reaching, raising questions about privacy and the potential for misuse of sensitive data. The public awaits further developments and clarification on the lawful implications of this ruling.