The Nerd Stash
A LA Influencer Causes Rage by Proposing "No Children" Policies in Rentals That…
An influencer in California argues that if rentals have “no pets” policies, they should also implement “no children” policies.
2k
3k
86
36k
Viral Video Sparks Debate: Should Rental Properties Have "No Kids" Policies Like "No Pets"?
A recent social media video by comedian Julia Austin has ignited a debate regarding rental property policies, specifically the disparity between "no pets" rules and the allowance of children. In her video, Austin humorously questioned why landlords often prohibit pets due to potential damage, yet permit children who, she argues, can cause similar or even greater destruction, citing examples like flushed toys, spilled food on carpets, and drawings on walls. The video, which has garnered significant attention with over 12,900 views and 519 comments, highlights a contentious point for many renters and property owners. Commenters expressed diverse views, with some agreeing that children can be destructive and that "child-free" housing options should exist. Others strongly criticized the comparison of children to pets, emphasizing that children are human beings and protected under anti-discrimination laws in many regions. Property managers and legal experts note that while pets are not a protected class, familial status (which includes children) is. This legal distinction often prevents landlords from implementing "no kids" policies, even if they perceive potential damage risks. The discussion underscores the complex challenges landlords face in balancing property protection with fair housing regulations, and the varying perspectives of tenants on community living.
