America's Two-Tiered Justice System: How Arbitration Clauses Silence the Poor

America's Hidden Inequality: How Arbitration Agreements Silence the Voices of the Common Citizen In a recent podcast interview, Sean Kelly highlighted a critical issue plaguing the American legal system: the widespread use of mandatory arbitration clauses. These clauses, often buried deep within contracts for everyday services and products, prevent ordinary citizens from pursuing legal action against powerful corporations and wealthy individuals. Kelly argues that this system effectively creates a two-tiered justice system, where the rich enjoy legal protections unavailable to the average American. He cites examples such as arbitration clauses found in smartphone apps, employment contracts, and even rental agreements, illustrating the pervasiveness of this practice. "You only get the justice you can afford in America," Kelly states, emphasizing the stark reality faced by many. The implications are significant. A dispute with a large corporation or a wealthy person often leaves the average citizen with limited options. They are forced into private arbitration where the process is often biased and expensive, effectively silencing their voices and preventing them from seeking redress. This situation demands attention and reform. The current system disproportionately favors the wealthy, undermining the principles of equal justice for all. The conversation needs to shift towards greater transparency and fairness in contract law, ensuring that all Americans have equal access to justice.