General Strike: A Response to US Court Inaction?

The US court system's response to constitutional violations versus economic issues is a topic of ongoing debate. Critics argue that the courts prioritize economic stability over addressing constitutional concerns, even in the face of autocracy. This is exemplified by the slow response to alleged constitutional breaches, contrasted with the swift action taken in response to economic turmoil. Senator Adam Schiff's recent call to confront autocracy highlights the perceived inaction of the Democratic Party, leading some to suggest a general strike as a potential solution to force government accountability. 'The courts prefer economic stability, even over upholding the Constitution,' states one commentator. However, supporters of the current system argue that the courts are acting within their established legal framework. The debate underscores the complex interplay between constitutional principles and economic realities in the US political system.