
« Et si votre femme se faisait stériliser à votre place ? » : sous le choc, il …
Un futur papa en salle d’attente pour sa vasectomie a été stupéfait de découvrir un dépliant médical qui lui suggérait de faire porter la charge cont…
During a recent vasectomy consultation, a patient expressed significant frustration after being presented with a pamphlet titled 'Consider the Alternatives.' The document, intended to outline various birth control options, prominently featured female sterilization methods such as tubal ligation and IUDs as alternatives to a vasectomy. The patient, who wishes to remain anonymous, highlighted the disparity, stating, 'A vasectomy is a 30-minute procedure with maybe three days of ice and light activity. It's barely a sprained ankle.' He criticized the suggestion of more invasive and permanent procedures for women, such as tubal ligation, which requires surgery and is described as 'more involved and costs more than vasectomy.' He also pointed out the description of IUD insertion as 'must be placed into the uterus by a provider,' sarcastically calling it a 'very gentle way to describe getting an IUD implanted.' The patient's wife, upon reviewing the list, reportedly commented on the limited male-involved options, noting, 'You're giving men a lot of credit for thinking they're going to wait' for methods like the rhythm method. This incident has raised questions about the gendered approach to family planning counseling in some medical practices.
Un futur papa en salle d’attente pour sa vasectomie a été stupéfait de découvrir un dépliant médical qui lui suggérait de faire porter la charge cont…